Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Trypanosome Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Biosynthesis

Trypanosome Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Biosynthesis

Article information

Korean J Parasito. 2009;47(3):197-204
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 August 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2009.47.3.197
1Department of Parasitology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 700-422, Korea.
2Department of Immunoregulation, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Corresponding author (ychong@knu.ac.kr)
Received 2009 May 09; Revised 2009 July 30; Accepted 2009 July 30.

Abstract

Trypanosoma brucei, a protozoan parasite, causes sleeping sickness in humans and Nagana disease in domestic animals in central Africa. The trypanosome surface is extensively covered by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins known as variant surface glycoproteins and procyclins. GPI anchoring is suggested to be important for trypanosome survival and establishment of infection. Trypanosomes are not only pathogenically important, but also constitute a useful model for elucidating the GPI biosynthesis pathway. This review focuses on the trypanosome GPI biosynthesis pathway. Studies on GPI that will be described indicate the potential for the design of drugs that specifically inhibit trypanosome GPI biosynthesis.

INTRODUCTION

Trypanosoma brucei is a protozoan parasite whose life cycle includes residence in the tsetse fly, and which invades mammals when the fly obtains a blood meal. This protozoan causes sleeping sickness in humans and Nagana disease in domestic animals in central Africa. According to the World Health Organization, about 55 million people in 36 countries of sub-Saharan Africa live in regions that are endemic for sleeping sickness, and about 500,000 people become infected every year. If untreated or not treated properly, the disease is fatal. Treatment of African trypanosomiasis is hindered by the potent toxicity of the drugs being used, and the difficulty in their administration. No effective vaccine or orally-administered drugs have yet been developed [1].

T. brucei has 2 distinct proliferative stages; the bloodstream form, which causes sleeping sickness in humans, and the procyclic form, which resides in the tsetse fly. The surface of both forms is covered by a large amount of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins known as variant surface glycoproteins (VSG) and procyclins. In the host bloodstream, the trypanosome cell surface is densely coated with approximately 10 million VSG molecules. T. brucei escapes the host's humoral immune response by sequentially expressing structurally different forms of VSG; the parasites' genome harbors approximately 1,000 VSG genes. When a tsetse fly takes blood meal from an infected patient, the ingested bloodstream form differentiates into the procyclic form; the differentiation involves the loss of the VSG surface protein and alteration of procyclin, which is composed of several million acidic glycoproteins. Proclycins are thought to function in retarding digestion of the parasite in the tsetse fly gut [2]. It is thought that the GPI anchor is important for survival of both forms of the trypanosome and for establishment of the infection.

In this review, we focus on the trypanosome GPI biosynthesis pathway. Trypanosomes are not only pathogenically important, but also constitute a useful model for elucidating the GPI biosynthesis pathway. Studies on GPI that will be described here have indicated the potential for the design of drugs to specifically inhibit trypanosome GPI biosynthesis. This approach could be useful in the treatment of trypanosomiasis.

GPI BIOSYNTHESIS BY TRYPANOSOMES

Structures of GPI

Many eukaryotic membrane proteins are covalently linked to GPI, which has unique structures containing oligosaccharides and inositol phospholipids, through post-translational modification, and are anchored to the membrane by the lipid moieties. GPI structures of some mammalian proteins, as well as protozoan parasites including T. brucei, have been investigated [3,4]. GPI anchors have a conserved core structure, which is sequentially conjugated by ethanolamine phosphate (EtNP), 3 mannoses (3Man), glucosamine (GlcN), and inositol phospholipids (EtN-PO4-6Manα1-2Manα1-6Manα1-4GlcNα1-6myo-inositol-1-PO4-lipid) (Fig. 1). There can be a wide variety of substituents in the mannoside, inositol, or lipid moieties depending on the particular protein, organism, or developmental stage of an organism. The GPI anchor of VSG contains a dimyristoylphosphatidylinositol moiety and galactose (Gal) side chain, whereas that of procyclin has predominantly 1-O-stearoyl-2-lysophosphatidylinositol and palmitoylated inositol and harbors a large and heterogeneously sialylated polylactosamine-containing side chain at the first mannose instead of at the Gal side chain [3,5-7]. Although the cell surface density of GPI-anchored proteins is generally not high in mammalian cells, such cells express a large repertoire of GPI-anchored proteins. In striking contrast, the cell surface of the protozoan parasite is densely coated predominantly by a few species of GPI-anchored proteins [8-13].

Fig. 1

The structure of GPI anchor of VSG from bloodstream form of trypanosome.

GPI biosynthesis

The GPI anchor is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by many different enzymes, which sequentially transfer sugars and EtNP to phosphatidylinositol (PI). After synthesis, the GPI anchor is attached to the protein by GPI transamidase before being transported to the cell surface [14-17].

The first step

The first step in GPI biosynthesis is initiated by the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) from uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) to PI, which generates GlcNAc-PI in the cytoplasmic face of the ER. In mammalian cells, the enzyme involved in this step is GPI-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (GPI-GnT), an ER membrane-bound multiprotein complex composed of at least 7 proteins: phosphatydylinositol glycan class A; PIG-A, PIG-C, PIG-H, PIG-Q, PIG-P, dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2; DPM2, and PIG-Y [18-20] (Fig. 2-①, Table 1). PIG-A has been implicated in the catalytic activity of the transferase. In mammals, somatic mutation of PIG-A, which disrupts the GPI anchor biosynthesis, is involved in paroxysmal noctural hemoglobinuria (PNH) [21].

Fig. 2

The GPI biosynthesis pathways of T. brucei and mammalian cells. The uppermost row indicates the pathway of the procyclic form of T. brucei. The middle row represents the pathway of the bloodstream form and the lowermost row depicts the pathway of mammalian cells. The reactions indicated by the circled numbers (①-⑧) correspond to those described in the text. The involved protein(s) of each step are summarized in Table 1.

Comparison of trypanosome and mammalian genes involved in GPI biosynthesis

The second step

The resulting GlcNAc-PI is deacetylated to yield glucosaminyl-PI (GlcN-PI) (Fig. 2-②) in a reaction catalyzed by a specific zinc metalloenzyme called N-deacetylase (deNAc, also designated PIG-L in mammals and TbGPI12 in trypanosomes), which is localized on the cytoplasmic side of the ER [22-24]. A study using trypanosomes and a HeLa cell-free system demonstrated that the trypanosome enzyme does not recognize GlcNAc-PI analogues containing 2-O-octyl-D-myo-inositol or L-myo-inositol, in contrast to the HeLa enzyme [25]. Moreover, the IC50 of potent inhibitors against trypanosome deNAc was significantly lower (approximately 8 nM) compared with human deNAc (100 µM), suggesting that the trypanosome enzyme has different substrate specificity than catalytically similar mammalian enzymes, which may be exploited as a chemotherapeutic target against trypanosomiasis [26].

The third step

GlcN-PI is likely flipped to the luminal side of the ER membrane before acylation. After this, T. brucei and mammalian GPI biosynthetic pathways diverge. In mammals, acylation of the inositol moiety of GlcN-PI, which is mediated by inositol acyltransferase (PIG-W), generates GlcN-acyl-PI before the first mannosylation [27]. In contrast, inositol acylation in trypanosomes only occurs after the first mannosylation and generates Man-GlcN-acyl-PI, indicating that inositol acylation is not a prerequisite for trypanosome mannosyl transferases (Fig. 2-③) [28,29]. Inositol acyltransferase in trypanosomes requires the presence of a hydroxyl group at the 4th position on the first mannose and a free amine on the glucosamine residue and, thus, mannosylation is required prior to inositol acylation in trypanosome GPI biosynthesis [30]. Moreover, inositol acylation and deacylation occur on multiple GPI intermediates. These results suggest that trypanosome inositol acylase and deacylase have different and broader substrate specificities than those of mammals. The enzymes responsible for inositol acylation and deacylation in T. brucei are sensitive to phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [31,32], whereas enzymes with similar activity in mammalian cells are unaffected [33]. Therefore, inositol acylation in trypanosomes is a good target for chemotherapy.

In yeasts, the efficient delivery of GlcN-acyl-PI to the first GPI-mannosyltransferase (GPI-MT-I) requires Arv1, which is a transmembrane protein containing potential zinc-binding motifs and which is a novel mediator of eukaryotic sterol homeostasis [34]. The orthologue of Arv1 with significant sequence homology has been detected only in a Plasmodium genome database but not in that of Trypanosoma (GeneDB accession no. PF100110) (data not shown).

The fourth step

In the next step, mannoses are transferred from dolichol-phosphate-mannose (Dol-P-Man) to GPI intermediates through different glycosidic linkages (Fig. 2-④). The first mannose is transferred to position 4 of the GlcN constituent of GlcN-acyl-PI by GPI-MT-I (a complex of PIG-M and PIG-X in humans) [35,36]. However, in T. brucei the first mannose is instead transferred to GlcN-PI, indicative of a different substrate specificity of GPI-MT- I between trypanosome and mammals. Moreover, GlcN-(2-O-hexadecyl)-phosphatidylinositol, a synthetic analogue of the GPI intermediate at this step, selectively inhibits trypanosomal GPI-MT-I, but not human GPI-MT-I [37]. Thus, GPI-MT-I appears to be a promising target of trypanosome-specific inhibitors, even though it has not been identified yet in trypanosomes.

Following the transfer of the first mannose, the second mannose is transferred to position 6 of the first mannose in Man-GlcN-acyl-PI by GPI α1-6 mannosyltransferase (Fig. 2-④) (GPI-MT-II, PIG-V in humans) [38]. A trypanosome orthologue has not yet been identified. Subsequently, a third mannose is transferred by GPI α1-2 mannosyltransferase III (GPI-MT-III, PIG-B in humans and TbGPI10 in trypanosomes) [39,40]. The observation that the construction of a knockout mutant of TbGPI10 is possible only when episomal TbGPI10 is introduced is consistent with the suggestion that TbGPI10 is essential for the growth of the bloodstream form of T. brucei [40]. Identification of the specific inhibitor against trypanosome GPI-MT-III with an IC50 of 1.7 µM from substrate analogs containing amino group at 2'-position of second mannose in Man2-GlcN-IPC18, a phosphate-linked C18 alkyl chain instead of Man2-GlcN-PI diacylglycerol [30], implicates TbGPI10 as a valid target of trypanosome-specific inhibitors.

The fifth step

Protein is attached to the GPI through EtNP that is transferred from phosphatidylethanolamine to position 6 of the third mannose (Fig. 2-⑤). This reaction is mediated by PIG-F and PIG-O in mammalian cells [41]. PIG-O is likely to be a catalytic component of the EtNP transferase forming a complex with PIG-F, which likely assists in stabilization of the enzyme complex. However, the orthologues of PIG-F and PIG-O have not yet been identified in trypanosomes. In mammalian cells and yeasts, an additional EtNP is added to the first (mediated by PIG-N) [42] or second mannose (mediated by PIG-F and PIG-G) [43], whereas these modifications do not occur in trypanosomes.

The penultimate step

In the T. brucei GPI biosynthetic pathway, inositol acylation takes place only after the formation of Man-GlcN-PI (Fig. 2-③). Then, the inositol-linked acyl chain can be removed or added again to any of the GPI intermediates bearing 1-3 mannoses with a dynamic equilibrium between inositol acylated and nonacylated species (Fig. 2-⑥) [29,31,44]. In mammalian cells, the inositol-linked acyl-chain remains until the mature GPI anchor is attached to the protein, whereupon it is removed by GPI inositol deacylase (PGAP1; post-GPI attachment to protein I) [45], indicating that inositol acylation and deacylation are distinctively separate events in mammalian GPI biosynthesis. In contrast, inositol is deacylated prior to attachment to VSG in bloodstream form, whereas it remains acylated in procyclins in the procyclic form. Thus, inositol deacylation likely occurs more efficiently in the bloodstream form compared with the procyclic form. Previously, a GPI inositol deacylase (GPIdeAc) gene was cloned in trypanosome and its activity demonstrated using an affinity-purified recombinant protein [46]. Inositol-acylated GPI biosynthetic intermediates accumulated in a knock-out mutant although some activity remained, suggesting that another inositol deacylase may be present [46,47]. Recently, another T. brucei GPI inositol deacylase 2 (GPIdeAc2) was cloned and was demonstrated to be essential in the bloodstream form, with its activity likely being tightly regulated in the trypanosome life cycle [48]. GPIdeAc2 is homologous to mammalian PGAP1, sharing the same lipase motif with catalytic serine [45]. However, these 2 enzymes act at different times. As mentioned above, inositol-deacylation occurs before attachment to proteins in trypanosomes, whereas the acyl chain is removed from inositol after attachment to proteins in mammalian cells [13,29,49]. Moreover, diisopropylfluorophosphate selectively inhibits inositol deacylase activity in trypanosomes, whereas mammalian inositol deacylase having a similar activity is not affected [50,51], indicating that the trypanosome inositol deacylase has a different substrate specificity and so is a good candidate drug target.

The final step (lipid remodeling of the GPI anchor)

In the last step of trypanosome GPI biosynthesis, the lipid moiety of the GPI anchor, sn-1 (C18:0) and sn-2 fatty acids (a mixture of C18-C22), is replaced with myristate (a saturated fatty acid containing 14 carbon atoms) in a lipid remodeling reaction (Fig. 2-⑦). This reaction occurs in the ER before transfer to the VSG protein. The lipid remodeling is initiated by removal of a longer fatty acid attached to the sn-2 position of glycolipid A' to form glycolipid θ, prior to acylation by attachment of myristate using myristoyl-CoA as a donor. As a next step, deacylation occurs at the sn-1 position to form the lyso species glycolipid θ'. The second myristate is then incorporated into the sn-1 position, forming dimyristated GPI (glycolipid A) on which VSG is attached. Thus, lipid remodeling consists of sequential deacylation and reacylation reactions. Recently, it has been reported that myristate transfer in GPI fatty acid remodeling in trypanosomes is mediated by TbGup1 [52]. However, the complete enzyme repertoire involved in lipid remodeling in trypanosomes remains unclear. In humans, fatty acid remodeling occurs in the Golgi after attachment of protein to the GPI anchor. Removal of the sn-2 unsaturated fatty acid from the lipid moiety of human GPI anchor requires PGAP3 [53] and replacement with stearic acid (C18:0) requires PGAP2 [54], while the sn-1 saturated fatty acid is retained in both the GPI precursor and GPI anchored protein.

GPI transamidation

After synthesis, the GPI anchor is attached to the protein by GPI transamidase before being transported to the cell surface (Fig. 2-⑧) [14-17]. GPI transamidase recognizes and cleaves the signal sequence at the C-terminus of nascent proteins and replaces it with the preassembled GPI anchor. In humans, GPI transamidase comprises at least 5 polypeptides (GAA1, GPI8, PIG-S, PIG-T, and PIG-U) [55,56]. The trypanosome GPI transamidase is also multi-enzyme complex in that 3 components (TbGAA1, TbGPI8, and TbGPI16) are homologous to human components (GAA1, GPI8, and PIG-T, respectively), and 2 other components (TTA1 and TTA2) are unique to the trypanosome enzyme [57]. TbGPI8 (GPI8 in human) is suggested to be the catalytic component responsible for cleavage of GPI-attachment signal sequences, and which is stabilized by the association with TbGPI16 through disulfide bond like mammalian GPI8 [48,55,57-66]. As mentioned above, the mammalian GPI transamidase must recognize diverse and structurally different proteins [67,68], whereas that of trypanosome processes limited kinds of proteins but which is highly expressed. Moreover, human GPI anchored protein that replaces its GPI attachment signal sequences with those of VSG does not readily become GPI-linked [69], indicating that trypanosome and mammalian GPI transamidases have different specificities against GPI anchored proteins. In addition to these protein differences, the GPI precursors themselves, which are recognized by the GPI transamidase, are structurally different. In mammalian GPIs, mannose residues are modified by extra EtNPs, whereas this modification does not occur in trypanosome, indicating that humans and trypanosomes have also different specificities against GPI anchor. Therefore, GPI transamidase in trypanosomes may be a good target for the development of anti-trypanosomal drugs.

CONCLUSION

Intensive studies of GPI for decades have revealed significant differences between mammalian and trypanosome GPI biosynthesis (Table 1). Compared with mammalian cells, trypanosomes utilize GPI for membrane anchoring of the major surface coat protein essential for its growth and survival. The specific steps in GPI biosynthesis may be potential targets for anti-trypanosomal agents. Identification of the enzymes that catalyze the specific biosynthetic steps and determination of their biochemical properties will provide the clues for revealing the specificity of the enzymes in trypanosomal and mammalian cells. Inhibitors that specifically inhibit trypanosome GPI biosynthesis without affecting the host will be a good chemotherapeutic treatment to combat trypanosomiasis. Further studies concerning inhibitor screening for inhibitory activity against trypanosome GPI biosynthesis are necessary to realize the anti-trypanosomal chemotherapy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Research Fund, 2007.

References

1. Cross GA. Antigenic variation in trypanosomes: secrets surface slowly. Bioessays 1996;18:283–291. 8967896.
2. Acosta-Serrano A, Vassella E, Liniger M, Kunz Renggli C, Brun R, Roditi I, Englund PT. The surface coat of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei: programmed expression and proteolytic cleavage of procyclin in the tsetse fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:1513–1518. 11171982.
3. Ferguson MA, Homans SW, Dwek RA, Rademacher TW. Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol moiety that anchors Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein to the membrane. Science 1988;239:753–759. 3340856.
4. Homans SW, Ferguson MA, Dwek RA, Rademacher TW, Anand R, Williams AF. Complete structure of the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor of rat brain Thy-1 glycoprotein. Nature 1988;333:269–272. 2897081.
5. Field MC, Menon AK, Cross GA. A glycosylphosphatidylinositol protein anchor from procyclic stage Trypanosoma brucei: lipid structure and biosynthesis. EMBO J 1991;10:2731–2739. 1655402.
6. Ferguson MAJ. Site of palmitoylation of a phospholipase C-resistant glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor. Biochem J 1992;284:297–300. 1318027.
7. Ferguson MAJ, Murray P, Rutherford H, McConville MJ. A simple purification of procyclic acidic repetitive protein and demonstration of a sialylated glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor. Biochem J 1993;291:51–55. 8471053.
8. Cross GA. Identification, purification and properties of clone-specific glycoprotein antigens constituting the surface coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitology 1975;71:393–417. 645.
9. McConville MJ, Ferguson MAJ. The structure, biosynthesis and function of glycosylated phosphatidylinositols in the parasitic protozoa and higher eukaryotes. Biochem J 1993;294:305–324. 8373346.
10. Pays E, Nolan DP. Expression and function of surface proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1998;91:3–36. 9574923.
11. Clayton CE, Mowatt MR. The procyclic acidic repetitive proteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Purification and post-translational modification. J Biol Chem 1989;264:15088–15093. 2475493.
12. Ferguson MA, Murray P, Rutherford H, McConville MJ. A simple purification of procyclic acidic repetitive protein and demonstration of a sialylated glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor. Biochem J 1993;291(Pt 1):51–55. 8471053.
13. Ferguson MA. The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J Cell Sci 1999;112:2799–2809. 10444375.
14. McConville MJ, Menon AK. Recent developments in the cell biology and biochemistry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipids. Mol Membr Biol 2000;17:1–16. 10824734.
15. Udenfriend S, Kodukula K. How glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. Annu Rev Biochem 1995;64:563–591. 7574493.
16. Tiede A, Bastisch I, Schubert J, Orlean P, Schmidt RE. Biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositols in mammalian and unicellular microbes. Biol Chem 1999;380:503–523. 10384957.
17. Ikezawa H. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. Biol Pharm Bull 2002;25:409–417. 11995915.
18. Watanabe R, Inoue N, Westfall B, Taron CH, Orlean P, Takeda J, Kinoshita T. The first step of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis is mediated by a complex of PIG-A, PIG-H, PIG-C and GPI1. EMBO J 1998;17:877–885. 9463366.
19. Watanabe R, Murakami Y, Marmor MD, Inoue N, Maeda Y, Hino J, Kangawa K, Julius M, Kinoshita T. Initial enzyme for glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis requires PIG-P and is regulated by DPM2. EMBO J 2000;19:4402–4411. 10944123.
20. Murakami Y, Siripanyaphinyo U, Hong Y, Tashima Y, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. The initial enzyme for glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis requires PIG-Y, a seventh component. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:5236–5246. 16162815.
21. Kawagoe K, Takeda J, Endo Y, Kinoshita T. Molecular cloning of murine Pig-a, a gene for GPI-anchor biosynthesis, and demonstration of interspecies conservation of its structure, function and gene locus. Genomics 1994;23:566–574. 7851884.
22. Nakamura N, Inoue N, Watanabe R, Takahashi M, Takeda J, Stevens VL, Kinoshita T. Expression cloning of PIG-L, a candidate N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol deacetylase. J Biol Chem 1997;272:15834–15840. 9188481.
23. Chang T, Milne KG, Guther ML, Smith TK, Ferguson MA. Cloning of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major genes encoding the GlcNAc-phosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylase of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis that is essential to the African sleeping sickness parasite. J Biol Chem 2002;277:50176–50182. 12364327.
24. Urbaniak MD, Crossman A, Chang T, Smith TK, van Aalten DM, Ferguson MA. The N-acetyl-D-glucosaminylphosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylase of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis is a zinc metalloenzyme. J Biol Chem 2005;280:22831–22838. 15817455.
25. Sharma DK, Smith TK, Weller CT, Crossman A, Brimacombe JS, Ferguson MAJ. Differences between the trypanosomal and human GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylases of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchor biosynthesis. Glycobiology 1999;9:415–422. 10089216.
26. Smith TK, Crossman A, Borissow CN, Paterson MJ, Dix A, Brimacombe JS, Ferguson MA. Specificity of GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylase of GPI biosynthesis and synthesis of parasite-specific suicide substrate inhibitors. EMBO J 2001;20:3322–3332. 11432820.
27. Murakami Y, Siripanyapinyo U, Hong Y, Kang JY, Ishihara S, Nakakuma H, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. PIG-W is critical for inositol acylation but not for flipping of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:4285–4295. 14517336.
28. Smith TK, Milne FC, Sharma DK, Crossman A, Brimacombe JS, Ferguson MA. Early steps in glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis in Leishmania major. Biochem J 1997;326:393–400. 9291110.
29. Güther ML, Ferguson MA. The role of inositol acylation and inositol deacylation in GPI biosynthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J 1995;14:3080–3093. 7621823.
30. Urbaniak MD, Yashunsky DV, Crossman A, Nikolaev AV, Ferguson MA. Probing enzymes late in the trypanosomal glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthetic pathway with synthetic glycosylphosphatidylinositol analogues. ACS Chem Biol 2008;3:625–634. 18928250.
31. Güther ML, Masterson WJ, Ferguson MA. The effects of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on inositol-acylation and fatty acid remodeling in African trypanosomes. J Biol Chem 1994;269:18694–18701. 7518442.
32. Guther ML, Ferguson MA. The role of inositol acylation and inositol deacylation in GPI biosynthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J 1995;14:3080–3093. 7621823.
33. Güther ML, Masterson WJ, Ferguson MA. The role of glycolipid C in the GPI biosynthetic pathway in Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms. Braz J Med Biol Res 1994;27:121–126. 8081219.
34. Kajiwara K, Watanabe R, Pichler H, Ihara K, Murakami S, Riezman H, Funato K. Yeast ARV1 is required for efficient delivery of an early GPI intermediate to the first mannosyltransferase during GPI assembly and controls lipid flow from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19:2069–2082. 18287539.
35. Maeda Y, Watanabe R, Harris CL, Hong Y, Ohishi K, Kinoshita K, Kinoshita T. PIG-M transfers the first mannose to glycosylphosphatidylinositol on the lumenal side of the ER. EMBO J 2001;20:250–261. 11226175.
36. Ashida H, Hong Y, Murakami Y, Shishioh N, Sugimoto N, Kim YU, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. Mammalian PIG-X and yeast Pbn1p are the essential components of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-mannosyltransferase I. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:1439–1448. 15635094.
37. Smith TK, Sharma DK, Crossman A, Brimacombe JS, Ferguson MA. Selective inhibitors of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthetic pathway of Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J 1999;18:5922–5930. 10545104.
38. Kang JY, Hong Y, Ashida H, Shishioh N, Murakami Y, Morita YS, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. PIG-V involved in transferring the second mannose in glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J Biol Chem 2005;280:9489–9497. 15623507.
39. Takahashi M, Inoue N, Ohishi K, Maeda Y, Nakamura N, Endo Y, Fujita T, Takeda J, Kinoshita T. PIG-B, a membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum with a large lumenal domain, is involved in transferring the third mannose of the GPI anchor. EMBO J 1996;15:4254–4261. 8861954.
40. Nagamune K, Nozaki T, Maeda Y, Ohishi K, Fukuma T, Hara T, Schwarz RT, Sutterlin C, Brun R, Riezman H, Kinoshita T. Critical roles of glycosylphosphatidylinositol for Trypanosoma brucei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10336–10341. 10954751.
41. Hong Y, Maeda Y, Watanabe R, Inoue N, Ohishi K, Kinoshita T. Requirement of PIG-F and PIG-O for transferring phosphoethanolamine to the third mannose in glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J Biol Chem 2000;275:20911–20919. 10781593.
42. Hong Y, Maeda Y, Watanabe R, Ohishi K, Mishkind M, Riezman H, Kinoshita T. Pig-n, a mammalian homologue of yeast Mcd4p, is involved in transferring phosphoethanolamine to the first mannose of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J Biol Chem 1999;274:35099–35106. 10574991.
43. Shishioh N, Hong Y, Ohishi K, Ashida H, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. GPI7 is the second partner of PIG-F and involved in modification of glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J Biol Chem 2005;280:9728–9734. 15632136.
44. Menon AK, Schwarz RT, Mayor S, Cross GA. Cell-free synthesis of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol precursors for the glycolipid membrane anchor of Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoproteins. Structural characterization of putative biosynthetic intermediates. J Biol Chem 1990;265:9033–9042. 1693147.
45. Tanaka S, Maeda Y, Tashima Y, Kinoshita T. Inositol deacylation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins is mediated by mammalian PGAP1 and yeast Bst1p. J Biol Chem 2004;279:14256–14263. 14734546.
46. Guther ML, Leal S, Morrice NA, Cross GA, Ferguson MA. Purification, cloning and characterization of a GPI inositol deacylase from Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J 2001;20:4923–4934. 11532956.
47. Guther ML, Prescott AR, Ferguson MA. Deletion of the GPIdeAc gene alters the location and fate of glycosylphosphatidylinositol precursors in Trypanosoma brucei. Biochemistry 2003;42:14532–14540. 14661966.
48. Hong Y, Nagamune K, Morita YS, Nakatani F, Ashida H, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. Removal or maintenance of inositol-linked acyl chain in GPI is critical in trypanosome life cycle. J Biol Chem 2006;281:11595–11602. 16510441.
49. Doerrler WT, Ye J, Falck JR, Lehrman MA. Acylation of glucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol revisited. J Biol Chem 1996;271:27031–27038. 8900192.
50. Guther ML, Masterson WJ, Ferguson MA. The effects of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on inositol-acylation and fatty acid remodeling in African trypanosomes. J Biol Chem 1994;269:18694–18701. 7518442.
51. Guther ML, Masterson WJ, Ferguson MA. The role of glycolipid C in the GPI biosynthetic pathway in Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms. Braz J Med Biol Res 1994;27:121–126. 8081219.
52. Jaquenoud M, Pagac M, Signorell A, Benghezal M, Jelk J, Butikofer P, Conzelmann A. The Gup1 homologue of Trypanosoma brucei is a GPI glycosylphosphatidylinositol remodelase. Mol Microbiol 2008;67:202–212. 18036137.
53. Fujita M, Jigami Y. Lipid remodeling of GPI-anchored proteins and its function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008;1780:410–420. 17913366.
54. Tashima Y, Taguchi R, Murata C, Ashida H, Kinoshita T, Maeda Y. PGAP2 is essential for correct processing and stable expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2006;17:1410–1420. 16407401.
55. Ohishi K, Inoue N, Kinoshita T. PIG-S and PIG-T, essential for GPI anchor attachment to proteins, form a complex with GAA1 and GPI8. EMBO J 2001;20:4088–4098. 11483512.
56. Hong Y, Ohishi K, Kang JY, Tanaka S, Inoue N, Nishimura J, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. Human PIG-U and yeast Cdc91p are the fifth subunit of GPI transamidase that attaches GPI-anchors to proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:1780–1789. 12802054.
57. Nagamune K, Ohishi K, Ashida H, Hong Y, Hino J, Kangawa K, Inoue N, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. GPI transamidase of Trypanosoma brucei has two previously uncharacterized (trypanosomatid transamidase 1 and 2) and three common subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:10682–10687. 12958211.
58. Ohishi K, Nagamune K, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. Two subunits of glycosylphosphatidylinositol transamidase, GPI8 and PIG-T, form a functionally important intermolecular disulfide bridge. J Biol Chem 2003;278:13959–13967. 12582175.
59. Ohishi K, Inoue N, Maeda Y, Takeda J, Riezman H, Kinoshita T. Gaa1p and gpi8p are components of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) transamidase that mediates attachment of GPI to proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11:1523–1533. 10793132.
60. Meyer U, Benghezal M, Imhof I, Conzelmann A. Active site determination of Gpi8p, a caspase-related enzyme required for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition to proteins. Biochemistry 2000;39:3461–3471. 10727241.
61. Vidugiriene J, Vainauskas S, Johnson AE, Menon AK. Endoplasmic reticulum proteins involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor attachment: photocrosslinking studies in a cell-free system. Eur J Biochem 2001;268:2290–2300. 11298746.
62. Spurway TD, Dalley JA, High S, Bulleid NJ. Early events in glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition: substrate proteins associates with the transamidase subunit Gpi8p. J Biol Chem 2001;276:15975–15982. 11278620.
63. Kang X, Szallies A, Rawer M, Echner H, Duszenko M. GPI anchor transamidase of Trypanosoma brucei: in vitro assay of the recombinant protein and VSG anchor exchange. J Cell Sci 2002;115:2529–2539. 12045223.
64. Lillico S, Field MC, Blundell P, Coombs GH, Mottram JC. Essential roles for GPI-anchored proteins in African trypanosomes revealed using mutants deficient in GPI8. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:1182–1194. 12631733.
65. Benghezal M, Benachour A, Rusconi S, Aebi M, Conzelmann A. Yeast Gpi8p is essential for GPI anchor attachment onto proteins. EMBO J 1996;15:6575–6583. 8978684.
66. Hong Y, Nagamune K, Ohishi K, Morita YS, Ashida H, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T. TbGPI16 is an essential component of GPI transamidase in Trypanosoma brucei. FEBS Lett 2006;580:603–606. 16405969.
67. Low MG. The glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor of membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989;988:427–454. 2531614.
68. Kinoshita T, Inoue N, Takeda J. Defective glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Adv Immunol 1995;60:57–103. 8607375.
69. Moran P, Caras IW. Requirements for glycosylphosphatidylinositol attachment are similar but not identical in mammalian cells and parasitic protozoa. J Cell Biol 1994;125:333–343. 8163550.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The structure of GPI anchor of VSG from bloodstream form of trypanosome.

Fig. 2

The GPI biosynthesis pathways of T. brucei and mammalian cells. The uppermost row indicates the pathway of the procyclic form of T. brucei. The middle row represents the pathway of the bloodstream form and the lowermost row depicts the pathway of mammalian cells. The reactions indicated by the circled numbers (①-⑧) correspond to those described in the text. The involved protein(s) of each step are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of trypanosome and mammalian genes involved in GPI biosynthesis

Step Enzyme Gene
Mammals T. brucei
GPI-GlcNAc transferase PIG-A
PIG-H
PIG-C
GPI1(PIG-Q)
PIG-P
DPM2
PIG-Y
de-N-acetylase PIG-L TbGPI12 PIG-L TbGPI12
Acyltransferase PIG-W
GPI-α1-4mannosyltransferase I (MT-I) PIG-M
PIG-X
GPI-α1-6mannosyltransferase I (MT-II) PIG-V
GPI-α1-2mannosyltransferase I (MT-III) PIG-B TbGPI10
Ethanolamine-P-transferase (to the 1st mannose) PIG-N
Ethanolamine-P-transferase (to the 3rd mannose) PIG-O
Ethanolamine-P-transferase (to the 2nd mannose) PIG-F
GPI7(GPI-G)
GPI inositol deacylase PGAP1 TbGPIdeAc
TbGPIdeAc2

Fatty acid transferase (lipid remodeling) PGAP2 TbGup1

GPI transamidase GPI8 TbGPI8
GAA1 TbGaa1
PIG-S (TAA1)*
PIG-T TbGPI16
PIG-U (TAA2)*

Reaction steps correspond to those indicated in Fig. 2.