Infection Status of Hydatid Cysts in Humans and Sheep in Uzbekistan

Article information

Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51(3):383-385
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 June 30
doi :
1Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Endemic Diseases, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
2Department of Surgery, Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine, Tashkent 100107, Uzbekistan.
3Department of Coloproctology, Yang Hospital, Seoul 134-814, Korea.
4Department of Surgery, Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine Samarkand Branch, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
5Gospona Boraki Co., Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Corresponding author (
Received 2013 March 26; Revised 2013 April 18; Accepted 2013 April 22.


Uzbekistan is endemic of cystic echinococcosis (CE). In order to estimate endemicity of CE, we collected data from emergency surgery due to CE in 2002-2010 and also investigated the prevalence of hydatid cysts in the liver and lungs of sheep at an abattoir in Uzbekistan from July 2009 to June 2010. In 14 emergency hospitals, 8,014 patients received surgical removal or drainage of CE during 2002-2010, and 2,966 patients were found in 2010. A total of 22,959 sheep were grossly examined of their liver and lungs, and 479 (2.1%) and 340 (1.5%) of them were positive for the cyst in the liver and lungs, respectively. Echinococcus granulosus is actively transmitted both to humans and sheep, and CE is a zoonotic disease of public health priority in Uzbekistan.

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a global zoonotic larval tapeworm disease which is caused by the hydatid cyst of Echinococcus granulosus. The human is infected as an intermediate host of Echinococcus granulosus. The major mode of human infection is ingestion of its eggs by direct fecal contact of infected dogs or eating contaminated food or water [1]. Human infection is known as CE with other names of hydatid disease or hydatidosis. Human CE occurs mainly in the liver and lungs [2]. Therefore, the liver and lungs are major target organs of the disease screening. However, most of CE patients have no symptoms at the early stage of infection, and realize its subjective symptoms suddenly when the cyst is big or complicated. In such a circumstance, most of CE patients require emergency intervention. It is difficult to screen or estimate the symptomless infected people before appearance of the emergent medical episode even in endemic areas.

Several parameters are used instead to evaluate endemicity or disease occurrence in an endemic area. They are annual incidence of patients, infection rate of sheep or other mammals, and infection rate of dogs. Each parameter suggests its epidemiological significance for echinococcosis transmission in a certain area [2-4]. Uzbekistan is known endemic of CE with other middle Asian or Mediterranean countries [3]. Official reports figured 1,435 human cases in 2000 and 819 in 2001 in whole Uzbekistan, and the sheep were reported with high positive rates about 60% at the same time [3]. In order to investigate recent disease burden of CE in Uzbekistan, we collected patient data from the national networked hospitals of the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine in 2002-2010. Also all of the sheep were monitored of the hydatid cyst in their liver and lungs at an abattoir in Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, from July 2009 to June 2010.

In the 14 networked emergency medicine hospitals, a total of 8,014 patients received surgical intervention of CE during 2002-2010 (Table 1). All of them were diagnosed and treated under emergency condition. Since Uzbek surgeons are familiar with CE management, the number of patients could be a nearly real estimation, confirmed and managed by the 14 emergency hospitals. The true national figure of clinical CE patients must add numbers of CE patients cared by other hospitals to the 8,014 patients.

Numbers of surgical CE patients by the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine branches in 14 states of Uzbekistan, 2002-2010

Sheep are slaughtered every day in Tashkent. A total of 22,939 heads were slaughtered and grossly screened of their liver and lungs after devisceralization by a veterinarian. The hydatid cyst was recovered from the liver of 479 (2.1%) and from the lungs of 340 (1.5%) sheep, and total 819 (3.6%). Some of the sheep were infected both in the liver and lungs, and also other organs, but those details were not considered in this screening.

The Republican Sanitation and Epidemiology Center of Uzbekistan is officially monitoring and reporting patient numbers based upon reports from the 14 State Sanitation and Epidemiology Centers. The official data reported 1,438 cases in 1998, 1,435 in 2000, and 819 in 2001 [3]. The data were official numbers of CE patients in Uzbekistan, but they must have been underestimated. That is because only a part of the patients of emergency hospitals or other hospitals who were recognized at the local township health centers were included in the data. Many of them were dropped due to no collaboration system between the hospitals and the state Sanitation and Epidemiology Centers. The figure of 2,966 patients in 2010 was the minimum confirmed number of CE in Uzbekistan in the year. Furthermore, symptomless patients of early CE (ECE) must be much more than the confirmed figure. Some of ECE cases may become overt emergency patients after several years but some are not [5]. Torgerson et al. [3] suggested 3 times of more patients than that of official report in Uzbekistan. Since the official report counted about 1,000 cases in a year, the real number of cases were suggested about 3,000 and total 12,520 cases were estimated [3]. However, the network hospitals of emergency medicine recognized about 3,000 patients every year. There are many other hospitals which can take care of CE in whole country. Therefore, if we suppose that the transmission of E. granulosus is in an epidemiologically stable natural equilibrium, newly infected cases must be far more than 3,000 every year in Uzbekistan. The real population of patients must be much more than 12,520 because every infected patient carries the CE for several years without symptoms.

When a patient of ECE is diagnosed, he or she can be treated medically [1]. However, it is difficult and impractical to detect symptomless ECE. If a system for diagnosis of ECE is established, emergency surgical intervention could be reduced in Uzbekistan. The system should be supported by both serodiagnostic test and radiological or ultrasound images [1,6]. The serodiagnostic system using ELISA is essential and critical for upgraded management of both CE and ECE [7,8].

The Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine Samarkand Branch summarized records of CE patients by the involved organs (Table 2). The liver (69.0%) and the lungs (22.2%) were commonly involved, and 7 (1.5%) were cerebral CE. Other organs were involved but not frequently. Multiorgan infection might have been but not specified in this summary. The findings by organs were same in general as previously described [1,2].

Number of patients who received surgery of cystic echinococcosis in the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine, Samarkand Branch, 2005-2010

Between 1990 and 2002, the sheep was reported with cyst positive rates from 45.1% to 62.2% in Uzbekistan [3]. Also high rates of cattle (24.3-45.5%), pigs (6.0-8.0%), camels (25.4-35.0%), and donkeys (32.0-38.5%) were reported positive [3]. Our positive rate of 3.6% was much lower than that of the previous report. At present, it is not easy to explain the big difference. Just it is inferred that our study examined all sheep at an abattoir in Tashkent for one year while the previous ones were sampled in most hyperendemic local regions. It is difficult to directly compare data of separate studies of different locality, sampling, and timing. Although the positive rate was 3.6%, it is an enough evidence of active transmission of E. granulosus in Uzbekistan.

The infection rate of dogs is another important parameter in epidemiology because the dogs seed eggs of E. granulosus, and the eggs from them are infecting humans and sheep. The dogs were reported as 7.9% positive among village dogs and 20.1% among farm dogs in Uzbekistan [3]. The population of infected dogs in a community should be estimated to monitor accurately the infection force of E. granulosus. Since Uzbekistan is the most frequent country of imported CE cases in Korea, accurate and updated epidemiological parameters are required for proper management of the disease [9].

In conclusion, the 8,014 emergency patients in 2002-2010 confirm that CE is an important infectious disease in Uzbekistan. Also the infection rate of 3.6% among sheep is an evidence of active transmission of E. granulosus between sheep and dogs. CE is a helminthic zoonosis of public health priority in Uzbekistan.


1. Moro P, Schantz PM. Echinococcosis: a review. Int J Infect Dis 2009;13:125–133. 18938096.
2. da Silva AM. Human echinococcosis: a neglected disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010;2010:pii: 583297. doi: 10.1155/2010/583297.
3. Torgerson PR, Oguljahan B, Muminov AE, Karaeva RR, Kuttubaev OT, Aminjanov M, Shaikenov B. Present situation of cystic echinococcosis in Centrla Asia. Parasitol Int 2006;55:S207–S212. 16361112.
4. Cardona GA, Carmena D. A review of the global prevalence, molecular epidemiology and economics of cystic echinococcosis in production animals. Vet Parasitol 2013;192:10–32. 23084536.
5. Brunetti E, Garcia HH, Junghanss T. International CE Workshop in Lima, Peru, 2009. Cystic echinococcosis: chronic, complex, and still neglected. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011;5:e1146. 21814584.
6. Nunnari G, Pinzone MR, Gruttadauria S, Celesia BM, Mededdu G, Malaguarnera G, Pavone P, Cappellani A, Cacopardo B. Hepatic echinococcosis: clinical and therapeutic aspects. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:1448–1458. 22509076.
7. Zhang W, McManus DP. Recent advances in the immunology and diagnosis of echinococcosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006;47:24–41. 16706785.
8. Jin Y, Hong S, Anvarov K, Khajibaev A, Hong ST. Serodiagnosis of echinococcosis by ELISA using cystic fluid from Uzbekistan sheep. Korean J Parasitol 2013;51:313–317.
9. Ahn KS, Hong ST, Kang YN, Kwon JH, Kim MJ, Park TJ, Kim YH, Lim TJ, Kang KJ. An imported case of cystic echinococcosis in the liver. Korean J Parasitol 2012;50:357–360. 23230336.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

Numbers of surgical CE patients by the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine branches in 14 states of Uzbekistan, 2002-2010

State of Uzbekistan No. of patients by year
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Tashkent 30 80 56 81 136 285 146 128 122 1,064
Andijan 44 57 70 75 88 80 77 64 87 642
Bukhara - 15 16 35 35 37 39 44 47 268
Jizzak 78 65 67 76 83 92 79 91 81 712
Kashkadarya - 90 77 91 83 133 111 97 65 747
Navoi 63 92 89 90 99 83 106 96 101 819
Namangan - 62 49 47 88 77 69 33 50 475
Samarkand - 51 61 91 106 91 121 112 103 736
Surkhandarya - 77 49 50 58 56 51 57 53 451
Sirdarya 71 114 140 97 62 107 132 74 99 896
Tashkent Suburbs - - - - - - - 11 17 28
Fergana 19 23 49 52 74 95 62 60 52 486
Khorezm 105 79 77 42 16 33 57 54 55 518
Karakalpakstan 9 6 8 15 41 23 24 22 24 172
Total 2,421 2,814 2,812 2,847 2,975 3,199 3,082 2,952 2,966 8,014

Table 2.

Number of patients who received surgery of cystic echinococcosis in the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine, Samarkand Branch, 2005-2010

Clinical types of echinococcosis No. (%) of patientsa
Hepatic 336 (69.0)
Pulmonary 107 (22.2)
Abdominal 18 (3.7)
Splenic 8 (1.7)
Cerebral 7 (1.5)
Back subcutaneous 5 (1.0)
Total 481 (100)

Only the patients with clinical information of organ involvement were included.